Where we underperformed last quarter
Multifamily parcels (>4 units) closed at a 58% reduction rate vs. 76% for single-family. We're sharpening the comp sourcing for that segment in Q1.
Transparency chronicle
Our outcomes, published quarterly.
How many appeals we filed, how many we won, how much we saved our clients — and, when they matter, the ones we didn't win. Updated every quarter. Including the ugly numbers.
Median error: 7.6%
Based on 412 closed Indiana appeals
Q4 2025
Closed appeals between Oct 1 and Dec 31, 2025
- 1,217
- Appeals filed
- 74.2%
- Reduction rate
- $326
- Median savings
- 47
- Median days to decision
Across 37 Indiana counties
Appeals that reduced the assessment
Per successful appeal, annualized
From filing to informal hearing outcome
By county
We report outcomes at the county level once we cross 50 closed appeals. Smaller counties are marked "coming Q2 2026".
| County | Appeals filed | Win rate | Median savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marion | 204 | 78% | $412 |
| Hamilton | 156 | 82% | $389 |
| Allen | 89 | 71% | $298 |
| Lake | 132 | 65% | $264 |
| St. Joseph | 71 | 74% | $312 |
| Remaining counties — coming Q2 2026 once sample size crosses 50 closed appeals | |||
The lessons we learned
Some of these numbers are uncomfortable. They should be.
Counties where our methodology is weakest
Ohio and Switzerland counties have sample sizes under 30 closed appeals, which widens our error band. We're pausing new intake in those counties until the data density catches up.
What we changed in response to feedback
Every contingency-fee disclosure now appears 3× across the appeal flow (hero, mid-wizard, signature). This is a direct response to early-2025 feedback that fee placement felt buried.